Alleged corruption in Halal Certification procurement
Findings from an investigation by Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) point to alleged corruption in the 2025 procurement of halal certification services at the National Nutrition Agency (BGN), with potential state losses estimated at up to Rp 49.5 billion. ICW highlights four main issues, namely a weak legal basis for the procurement, the splitting of procurement packages, the use of unregistered service providers, and indications of cost inflation.
Tax-free restructuring
The government’s decision to exempt state-owned enterprises (SOEs) from taxes on corporate restructuring until 2029 may appear technical on the surface. Officials frame it as a pragmatic step to support consolidation, improve efficiency and accelerate the transformation of Indonesia’s sprawling SOE ecosystem under Danantara.
Regulating ride-hailing by presidential decree
The draft presidential regulation on the protection of online transportation workers may become one of the country’s most controversial digital economy policies in years. Presented as a long-overdue response to driver exploitation, the regulation promises tariff transparency, social security protection, limits on arbitrary account suspensions and stronger bargaining rights for ride-hailing drivers.
Salim vs Satgas PKH
Salim Ivomas Pratama (SIMP), controlled by Anthoni Salim’s Indofood Agri-Resources Ltd, is, by far, the only company openly challenged the hefty administrative fines charged by President Prabowo Subianto’s Forest Area Enforcement Task Force (Satgas PKH).
Borax, E. coli, and MBG’s fragile oversight
Last month, around 155 people in the Kepulauan Anambas Regency, Riau Islands, suffered food poisoning after consuming meals from the MBG program. The laboratory test results, which were only released recently, revealed traces of borax and E. coli contamination in the food samples. SPPG Air Asuk, the sole MBG provider in the area, has been temporarily suspended from operating due to this incident. But the problems do not stop there.
Cash limits and the fear inside Parliament
The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) recently renewed its push for the acceleration of the Bill on Restrictions of Cash Transactions (RUU Pembatasan Transaksi Uang Kartal/PTUK), arguing that limiting large cash transactions is necessary to combat money politics ahead of future elections. Officially, the proposal is framed as an anti-corruption measure. Politically, however, it touches the deepest nerve of Indonesia’s democratic system: the country’s dependence on cash-driven politics.
A legal battle over prime land in Menteng
The dispute over a heritage property on Teuku Umar Street in Menteng, Central Jakarta, may appear at first glance to be just another land conflict between a private company and the state. But the ongoing battle between PT Temasra Jaya and the Military (TNI) reveals something far larger: the unfinished legacy of military-controlled assets, the fragility of property rights in Indonesia, and the growing political reach of the armed forces beyond defense affairs.
Viral justice and the business of political law
The assault case involving Ronald Aristone Sinaga, better known as Bro Ron, is more than a sensational altercation inside a Jakarta law office. It reflects a deeper transformation in Indonesian public life: the rise of politicians who simultaneously operate as lawyers, media personalities and online influencers, turning legal disputes into political theater and viral content.
Fast refunds, selective capitalism
As Finance Minister introduced Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor 28 Tahun 2026, the government framed it as a long-overdue response to one of the private sector’s loudest complaints: slow tax refunds. By accelerating the return of overpaid taxes, the policy promises to improve business liquidity, reduce bureaucratic delays and signal a more business-friendly tax administration. On the surface, it is a reform that seems both rational and necessary.
Teddy vs Amien Rais
Recent remarks by Human Rights Minister, Natalius Pigai, suggest a troubling shift in how the state interprets dissent. By framing statements made by Amien Rais as potential “human rights violations” and implying that only cabinet secretary Teddy Indra Wijaya has the standing to report them, the government appears to be redrawing the boundary between criticism and criminality.