Oil Palm Plantation in West Papua

Since 2018 the West Papua Provincial Government, with the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)’s assistance, has evaluated the licensing of oil palm plantations in eight regencies. The plan is to use the evaluation result as a reference for regional governments to deliberate on the continuation of oil palm companies’ licenses. On Feb. 25, 2021, the KPK announced the evaluation result in a press conference.

PKPU/Bankruptcy Journal: Margahayu Land

On Feb. 19, 2021, the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court registered two lawsuits on the suspension of debt payment (PKPU) filed by the same Company: Singapore-based Sccpre Sixteen S Pte Ltd. The Company has filed four PKPU lawsuits in the span of...

On Social Assistance Graft Case: The Trial

Nearly three months ago the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) uncovered a case of corruption related to the procurement of social assistance programs at the Ministry of Social Affairs. The KPK named several suspects including then Minister Juliari Batubara. On...

Omnibus Law’s Implementing Regulation: PP 36/2021

Of the 45 Government Regulations (PP) issued by the Government as implementing regulations for Law No. 11/2020 concerning Job Creation (Omnibus Law), several PPs are getting extra attention. Today we outline PP No. 36/2021 concerning Wages. Labor organizations are challenging the new provisions in the said PP.

On the Land Mafia Case

A few weeks ago, former deputy minister of foreign affairs Dino Patti Djalal shared on his personal Twitter account that his mother had fallen victim to a land mafia syndicate scam. The syndicate illegally took several of the latter’s houses. Not long after, Dino named the person he suspected of masterminding this syndicate: Freddy Kusnadi. In turn, Freddy reported Dino to the police on suspicion of defamation. But just two days after the report was made, the police announced that it had arrested dozens of land mafia suspects, including Freddy.

An Update on AISA’s Dispute

On July 30, 2020, after being in dispute for nearly two years, Joko Mogoginta and Budhi Istanto (former executives of PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk – AISA) were finally found guilty of embezzlement. On the same day, the company’s new management held an incidental public expose to fulfill the requirements demanded by the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the reopening of the company’s securities trading on the Stock Exchange. AISA was finally allowed to recommence its operations in September 2020. In October 2020, Joko and Budhi were indicted for fraud. Their trial is ongoing. 

Omnibus Law’s Implementing Regulation: PP 35/2021

The Government has issued 49 implementing regulations for Law No. 11/2020 concerning Job Creation (Omnibus Law). The derivative regulations consist of 45 Government Regulations (PP) and four Presidential Regulations (Perpres). Among the dozens of implementing regulations is PP No. 35/2021. It regulates Fixed-Time Work Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Time and Rest Time, and Termination of Employment (PP PKWT-PHK). We will try to explain the provisions outlined in PP 35/2021 briefly.

Jakarta Floods: Enough is Enough

Jakarta and parts of West Java welcomed 2020 with a major flood. The situation in Jakarta was so bad that representatives of the affected residents sued the Governor of Jakarta. Unfortunately, the class-action lawsuit was rejected by the Court in May 2020. When the lawsuit was filed, we thought that the Provincial Government would respond by working on infrastructure to prevent another widespread flood. But that didn’t happen, and last week, another major flood paralyzed the capital city.

Law Journal

The trial of Hadinoto Soedigno, Garuda Indonesia’s former executive vice president for Engineering and Maintenance Services, continues. Hadinoto stands trial for alleged involvement in the scheme of corruption conducted under the leadership of Emirsyah Satar. Separately, the peace agreement on the debt dispute implicating Koperasi Simpan Pinjam (Kospin) Indosurya Cipta is now legally binding. 

Revising UU ITE

The Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (known as the UU ITE) has long been a scourge for many. This Law’s existence is important, but several articles are more striking than the Law’s purpose because it is often misused. This Law was first formed in 2011. It was last revised in 2016, but the revision does not provide the needed changes. The problematic articles still exist. Several attempts to question these articles to the Constitutional Court have not been successful. Recently, President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo expressed a discourse to revise this Law once again to ensure that everyone can criticize (the Government) without feeling afraid. Is this possible?

error: Content is protected !!